|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈冠华,陈宗飞,张端强.安氏Ⅱ类与Ⅲ类错牙合畸形牙弓与基骨弓关系测量分析[J].福建医科大学学报,2020,54(01):53-56.
 CHEN Guanhua,CHEN Zongfei,ZHANG Duanqiang.Relationship between Dental Arch and Basal Bone Arch of Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J].Journal of Fujian Medical University,2020,54(01):53-56.
点击复制

安氏Ⅱ类与Ⅲ类错牙合畸形牙弓与基骨弓关系测量分析(PDF)
分享到:

《福建医科大学学报》[ISSN:1672-4194/CN:35-1192/R]

卷:
第54卷
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
53-56
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship between Dental Arch and Basal Bone Arch of Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ Malocclusion
文章编号:
1672-4194(2020)01-0053-04
作者:
陈冠华 陈宗飞 张端强
福建医科大学 附属口腔医院正畸科,福州 350002
Author(s):
CHEN Guanhua CHEN Zongfei ZHANG Duanqiang
Department of Orthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China
关键词:
正畸学矫正 错牙合 牙牙合 牙模型 牙弓
Keywords:
orthodontics corrective malocclusion dental occlusion dental models dental arch
分类号:
R-05; R781.05; R781.2; R783.5
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 通过对安氏Ⅱ类与Ⅲ类患者数字化牙颌模型进行测量分析,为临床矫治计划的设计提供依据。 方法 收集30例安氏Ⅱ类与30例安氏Ⅲ类患者,扫描其石膏模型生成数字化模型,使用三维测量软件对数字化模型的牙弓宽度及基骨弓宽度进行测量,采用SPSS 25.0软件对测量结果进行统计学分析。 结果 安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形各测量牙位数据比较,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05); 安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者在上颌第二前磨牙区牙弓与基骨弓宽度比较,差别无统计学意义(P>0.05),其牙弓宽度为(52.94±1.85)mm,基骨弓宽度为(52.31±3.03)mm,其他牙位测量数据比较,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。安氏Ⅱ类与Ⅲ类错牙合畸形牙弓宽度比较,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05); 安氏Ⅱ类与Ⅲ类错牙合畸形基骨弓宽度对比在上颌第二前磨牙区、上颌第二磨牙区、下颌第二前磨牙区差别无统计学意义(P>0.05),其他牙位比较差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 安氏Ⅱ类上颌尖牙区宽度较安氏Ⅲ类患者大,其他部位牙弓宽度较Ⅲ类患者小; 安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者上颌基骨弓宽度大于安氏Ⅲ类患者,而下颌基骨弓宽度小于安氏Ⅲ类患者。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze and compare Class Ⅱ dental arch and basal bone characteristics of patients with Class Ⅲ through digital dental model, and to provide the basis for the design of clinical treatment plan. Methods There were 30 patients with Class Ⅱ and 30 patients with Class Ⅲ who were collected. The gypsum model was scanned by digital scanning to generate a digital model. The digital model was measured using 3D measurement software. The measurement results were statistically analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software. Result There were statistically significant differences in the Class Ⅱ malocclusion dental position measurement data(P<0.05)There were no significant differences in the width of the dental arch and the basal bone in the maxillary second premolar area of the Class Ⅲ malocclusion(P>0.05), the width of the dental arch was(52.94±1.85)mm and the width of the basal bone arch was(52.31±3.03)mm, comparison of other dental measurement data were statistically significant(P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the width of dental arch between Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ malocclusion(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the maxillary molar area, the second molar area, and the mandibular second premolar area in the width of the base bone arch between the Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ malocclusion; the data of other dental measurements were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The width of the Class Ⅱ maxillary canine is larger than that of the Class Ⅲ patients, and the width of the other parts is smaller than that of the Class Ⅲ patients. The width of the maxillary basal arch of the Class Ⅱ malocclusion is greater than that of the Class Ⅲ patients, while the mandibular basal arch width is smaller than Class Ⅲ patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周洁珉, 白玉兴, 王邦康. 数字化三维牙颌模型测量系统的可靠性对比研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2005,19(4):367-368.
[2] 王美青. 口腔解剖生理学[M]. 7版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:76-77.
[3] Tweed C H. Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure[J]. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1944, 30(8):405-428.
[4] 吴佳琪, 江久汇, 邹 薇, 等. 骨性Ⅱ类错牙合下颌牙弓与基骨形态相关性的三维测量研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2013,31(6):605-609.
[5] Ball R L, Miner R M, Will L A, et al. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class Ⅱ Division 1 and Class Ⅰ malocclusions[J]. AJO-DO, 2010,138(1):41-50.
[6] 武 杰, 王超然, 赵 伟, 等. 三维数字化建立恒牙期安氏Ⅱ类错牙合模型对牙弓和基骨弓的测量分析[J]. 中国组织工程究, 2017,21(36):5769-5774.
[7] 林思豆, 吴补领, 孙风阳,等. 三类骨性错牙合下颌牙弓和基骨弓的测量及相关性分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2016,34(2):171-175.
[8] 陈付蓉, 夏万利, 陈文静. 安氏Ⅲ类牙弓与基骨弓形态特征及其应用的研究进展[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2013,4(4):205-208.
[9] 张 林, 段沛沛, 陈扬熙. 正畸弓丝形态的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(2):273-276.

相似文献/References:

[1]张玉华,梁甲兴,林 立,等.一种新型正畸摩擦力实验装置[J].福建医科大学学报,2014,48(01):63.
[2]张玉华,梁甲兴,林立,等.唾液对Free-edge托槽摩擦力的影响[J].福建医科大学学报,2013,47(06):389.
 ZHANG Yuhua,LIANG Jiaxing,LIN Li,et al.Influence of Saliva on Friction of Freeedge Bracket[J].Journal of Fujian Medical University,2013,47(01):389.
[3]姚军,何炳蔚.替牙期儿童前牙反牙合隐形诱导矫治2例报告[J].福建医科大学学报,2013,47(06):398.
[4]林斌,梁甲兴,林立,等.不同骨面型对青少年骨性Ⅲ类错牙合正畸疗效影响的初步分析[J].福建医科大学学报,2014,48(04):253.
 LIN Bin,LIANG Jiaxing,LIN Li,et al.Preliminary Analysis of Treatment Outcomes Among Different Vertical Facial Skeletal Types in Adolescences with Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J].Journal of Fujian Medical University,2014,48(01):253.
[5]郭建斌,邹耿森,郑 辉,等.影响正畸用微螺钉种植体成功率的风险因素分析[J].福建医科大学学报,2017,51(02):126.
 GUO Jianbin,ZOU Gengsen,ZHENG Hui,et al.Risk Factors Associated with the Success Ratesof Orthodontic Miniscrew Implants[J].Journal of Fujian Medical University,2017,51(01):126.
[6]黄 跃,林李嵩,黄建平,等.数字化导板在手术优先正颌外科中应用的初步探讨[J].福建医科大学学报,2019,53(06):422.
 HUANG Yue,LIN Lisong,HUANG Jianping,et al.Application of Three Dimensional Printing Digital Guide Plate inSurgery-First-Orthodontic-Approach for Mandibular Asymmetry[J].Journal of Fujian Medical University,2019,53(01):422.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-05-13 基金项目: 福建省医学创新课题(2016-CX-40) 作者简介: 陈冠华,男,福建医科大学2018级硕士研究生 通讯作者: 张端强. Email: orthofj@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-30